Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Core Network

Will Different Nations Pursue Australia's Example in Prohibiting Social Media for Under-16s?

Australia's decisive move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

  • Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
  • Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
  • Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "an options in reserve".
  • In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," commented one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the state level due to national inaction.

  • Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
  • The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
  • Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use requiring parental permission.
  • The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are similarly taking action.

  • Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
  • Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are no longer content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.

The writer

Lisa Fowler

A cybersecurity specialist with over a decade of experience in network infrastructure and threat analysis.

Core Network

Type to search articles.